Skip to main content
2024 Retailer Report Card

Alimentation Couche-Tard

and subsidiaries
F
Total Score
0
Out of 155
Rank
44
Out of 50

Subsidiaries of Alimentation Couche-Tard

Couche Tard
Couche-Tard
Circle K
Circle K
Ingo
Ingo

Key Findings and Recommendations

Based on available public information, Alimentation Couche-Tard has failed to take any steps toward safer products or packaging, either through a corporate chemicals policy, requiring information on chemical ingredients, restricting toxic chemicals and plastics beyond regulatory compliance, or supporting the development or sale of safer products. Alimentation Couche-Tard did not respond to our requests for additional information or comments on its draft score. Alimentation Couche-Tard should take action to safeguard consumers, communities, workers, and the environment from the health hazards of toxic chemicals and plastics.


2024 Detailed Analysis of Alimentation Couche-Tard

Corporate Commitment

Points = 0 out of 20
0%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Corporate Chemicals Policy

Adopted a safer chemicals policy

0 out of 7

Oversight

Established management oversight

0 out of 2.5

Chemical Footprint Project (CFP)

Participated in the CFP

0 out of 5.5

Collaboration

Actively participates in collaborative process to promote safer chemicals

0 out of 2.5

Public Policy Support

Supported governmental policies to reduce chemicals or plastics of high concern

0 out of 2.5

Transparency

Points = 0 out of 40
0%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Supply Chain Disclosure

Brands report use of chemicals or plastics in products or packaging to retailer

0 out of 14

Supplier Accountability

Ensures supply chain accountability for chemicals or plastics restrictions

0 out of 10

Consumer Disclosure

Brands disclose use of chemicals or plastics to consumers

0 out of 11

Chemical Footprint Calculation

Publicly disclosed its chemical footprint

0 out of 5

Ban the Bad

Points = 0 out of 45
0%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Restricted Substances List (RSL)/Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL)

0 out of 20

Reduction/Elimination Goals

0 out of 5

Chemicals and Plastics Reduction

Reduced or eliminated toxic chemicals or plastics of high concern

0 out of 20

Safer Solutions

Points = 0 out of 50
0%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Safer alternative definition

Adopted a definition of safer alternative consistent with Washington state

0 out of 5

Investment in Safer Solutions

Invested financial resources to advance and drive development of safer solutions

0 out of 20

Implementation of Safer Solutions

Replaced chemicals or plastics of concern with safer solutions

0 out of 20

Quantified Safer Products

Measured and disclosed progress towards safer products

0 out of 5

How does Alimentation Couche-Tard compare to its competitors?

Previous Grade History

NOTE: Our evaluation criteria changed in 2024. The scores from previous review years through 2021 are based on a different set of criteria measured.

Click or tap on a grade year to review additional details (where available).