Skip to main content
2024 Retailer Report Card

IKEA

B
Total Score
87.61
Out of 155
Rank
6
Out of 50

Key Findings and Recommendations

  • Corporate Commitment: IKEA has made a commitment to ensuring its products are safe throughout their lifecycle by reducing toxic chemicals of high concern, participating in collaborative processes to promote safer chemicals, and actively supporting government policies to phase out toxic chemicals in products. The company could further improve its chemicals management by participating in the Chemical Footprint Project survey.
  • Transparency: IKEA requires suppliers to disclose ingredients for toys and art supplies, chemical products, and electrical and electronic products according to separate Bills of Substances (BOS) for those products. The BOS call for some, not full disclosure of all intentionally added chemicals. The company has full insight into all ingredients (i.e. adhesives and surface coatings) for approximately 30 percent of wood-based products.
  • Ban the Bad: IKEA has made significant progress over many years in restricting chemicals and plastics of high concern including formaldehyde, PVC, PFAS, BPA, and expanded polystyrene in a number of products. IKEA has set goals to eliminate polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) from nonstick cooking and bakeware by 2026, and a general goal to reduce plastics in packaging. The company should continue this progress toward reaching its overarching goal to create safe and healthy products.
  • Safer Solutions: IKEA has restricted numerous chemicals that meet high hazard criteria such as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, and those that are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT). The company considers chemicals that do not meet these high hazard criteria as safer, which is consistent with the Washington state definition. IKEA has introduced stainless steel frying pans, a redesign that eliminates the need for PFAS or other chemical coating for some of its cookware. The company has also developed “positive lists” for safer alternatives to PFAS in coatings and biocides.

2024 Detailed Analysis of IKEA

Corporate Commitment

Points = 14.5 out of 20
73%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Corporate Chemicals Policy

Adopted a safer chemicals policy

7 out of 7

Oversight

Established management oversight

2.5 out of 2.5

Chemical Footprint Project (CFP)

Participated in the CFP

0 out of 5.5

Collaboration

Actively participates in collaborative process to promote safer chemicals

2.5 out of 2.5

Public Policy Support

Supported governmental policies to reduce chemicals or plastics of high concern

2.5 out of 2.5

Transparency

Points = 23.11 out of 40
58%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Supply Chain Disclosure

Brands report use of chemicals or plastics in products or packaging to retailer

8.65 out of 14

Supplier Accountability

Ensures supply chain accountability for chemicals or plastics restrictions

9 out of 10

Consumer Disclosure

Brands disclose use of chemicals or plastics to consumers

5.46 out of 11

Chemical Footprint Calculation

Publicly disclosed its chemical footprint

0 out of 5

Ban the Bad

Points = 30 out of 45
67%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Restricted Substances List (RSL)/Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL)

20 out of 20

Reduction/Elimination Goals

2 out of 5

Chemicals and Plastics Reduction

Reduced or eliminated toxic chemicals or plastics of high concern

8 out of 20

Safer Solutions

Points = 20 out of 50
40%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Safer alternative definition

Adopted a definition of safer alternative consistent with Washington state

5 out of 5

Investment in Safer Solutions

Invested financial resources to advance and drive development of safer solutions

0 out of 20

Implementation of Safer Solutions

Replaced chemicals or plastics of concern with safer solutions

15 out of 20

Quantified Safer Products

Measured and disclosed progress towards safer products

0 out of 5

How does IKEA compare to its competitors?

Previous Grade History

NOTE: Our evaluation criteria changed in 2024. The scores from previous review years through 2021 are based on a different set of criteria measured.

Click or tap on a grade year to review additional details (where available).