Skip to main content
2024 Retailer Report Card

McDonald’s

F
Total Score
13
Out of 155
Rank
35
Out of 50

Key Findings and Recommendations

  • Corporate Commitment: Based on available public information, McDonald’s has failed to commit to reducing toxic chemicals and plastics or supporting safer solutions. McDonald’s should publicly commit to develop and implement a corporate safer chemicals policy and actively explore best practices with peer organizations and outside experts.
  • Transparency: McDonald’s ensures that its packaging suppliers test for the presence of PFAS but does not appear to encourage or require suppliers to disclose to it or the public all indirect food additives in food contact materials going beyond regulatory compliance.
  • Ban the Bad: McDonald’s restricted and eliminated BPA, BPS, phthalates, PFOA, and PFOS from its food packaging between 2008-2015 and eliminated all food packaging made of expanded polystyrene foam in 2018. The company reported in 2023 that it had eliminated PFAS in food packaging in its U.S. restaurants, part of its goal to eliminate PFAS in food packaging globally by 2025. McDonald’s has also set a goal to reduce fossil-fuel based plastics in packaging and Happy Meal toys around the globe and transition to more sustainable materials by the end of 2025 but has not yet stated that alternatives must be less hazardous.
  • Safer Solutions: There is no indication that McDonald’s has supported the development or sale of safer products. McDonald’s should work to ensure substitutes for chemicals and plastics of high concern are safer for the health of consumers, communities, workers, and the environment.

2024 Detailed Analysis of McDonald’s

Corporate Commitment

Points = 0 out of 20
0%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Corporate Chemicals Policy

Adopted a safer chemicals policy

0 out of 7

Oversight

Established management oversight

0 out of 2.5

Chemical Footprint Project (CFP)

Participated in the CFP

0 out of 5.5

Collaboration

Actively participates in collaborative process to promote safer chemicals

0 out of 2.5

Public Policy Support

Supported governmental policies to reduce chemicals or plastics of high concern

0 out of 2.5

Transparency

Points = 2 out of 40
5%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Supply Chain Disclosure

Brands report use of chemicals or plastics in products or packaging to retailer

0 out of 14

Supplier Accountability

Ensures supply chain accountability for chemicals or plastics restrictions

2 out of 10

Consumer Disclosure

Brands disclose use of chemicals or plastics to consumers

0 out of 11

Chemical Footprint Calculation

Publicly disclosed its chemical footprint

0 out of 5

Ban the Bad

Points = 11 out of 45
24%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Restricted Substances List (RSL)/Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL)

3 out of 20

Reduction/Elimination Goals

3 out of 5

Chemicals and Plastics Reduction

Reduced or eliminated toxic chemicals or plastics of high concern

5 out of 20

Safer Solutions

Points = 0 out of 50
0%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Safer alternative definition

Adopted a definition of safer alternative consistent with Washington state

0 out of 5

Investment in Safer Solutions

Invested financial resources to advance and drive development of safer solutions

0 out of 20

Implementation of Safer Solutions

Replaced chemicals or plastics of concern with safer solutions

0 out of 20

Quantified Safer Products

Measured and disclosed progress towards safer products

0 out of 5

How does McDonald’s compare to its competitors?

Previous Grade History

NOTE: Our evaluation criteria changed in 2024. The scores from previous review years through 2021 are based on a different set of criteria measured.

Click or tap on a grade year to review additional details (where available).