Skip to main content
2024 Retailer Report Card

Subway

F
Total Score
11
Out of 155
Rank
37
Out of 50

Key Findings and Recommendations

  • Corporate Commitment: Based on available public information, Subway has failed to commit to reducing toxic chemicals and plastics or supporting safer solutions. Subway should publicly commit to develop and implement a corporate safer chemicals policy and actively explore best practices with peer organizations and outside experts.
  • Transparency: There is no indication Subway requires suppliers to disclose chemical ingredients or plastics to the retailer or consumers, nor that it requires testing to ensure products are free of hazardous chemicals or plastics beyond regulatory compliance. Subway should require ingredient disclosure, verify accuracy, and evaluate its chemical footprint.
  • Ban the Bad: Subway phased out PFAS from food packaging in 2020 and has eliminated expanded polystyrene from packaging. However, based on available public information, Subway does not have a current restricted substances list (RSL), nor current goals. Subway should set additional public, time-bound goals for reducing chemicals in plastics and packaging and report on its progress in meeting those goals.
  • Safer Solutions: There is no indication that Subway has supported the development or sale of safer products. Subway should work to ensure substitutes for chemicals and plastics of high concern are safer for the health of consumers, communities, workers, and the environment.

2024 Detailed Analysis of Subway

Corporate Commitment

Points = 0 out of 20
0%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Corporate Chemicals Policy

Adopted a safer chemicals policy

0 out of 7

Oversight

Established management oversight

0 out of 2.5

Chemical Footprint Project (CFP)

Participated in the CFP

0 out of 5.5

Collaboration

Actively participates in collaborative process to promote safer chemicals

0 out of 2.5

Public Policy Support

Supported governmental policies to reduce chemicals or plastics of high concern

0 out of 2.5

Transparency

Points = 0 out of 40
0%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Supply Chain Disclosure

Brands report use of chemicals or plastics in products or packaging to retailer

0 out of 14

Supplier Accountability

Ensures supply chain accountability for chemicals or plastics restrictions

0 out of 10

Consumer Disclosure

Brands disclose use of chemicals or plastics to consumers

0 out of 11

Chemical Footprint Calculation

Publicly disclosed its chemical footprint

0 out of 5

Ban the Bad

Points = 11 out of 45
24%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Restricted Substances List (RSL)/Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL)

1 out of 20

Reduction/Elimination Goals

0 out of 5

Chemicals and Plastics Reduction

Reduced or eliminated toxic chemicals or plastics of high concern

10 out of 20

Safer Solutions

Points = 0 out of 50
0%
= Excellent
= Some action
= No action

Safer alternative definition

Adopted a definition of safer alternative consistent with Washington state

0 out of 5

Investment in Safer Solutions

Invested financial resources to advance and drive development of safer solutions

0 out of 20

Implementation of Safer Solutions

Replaced chemicals or plastics of concern with safer solutions

0 out of 20

Quantified Safer Products

Measured and disclosed progress towards safer products

0 out of 5

How does Subway compare to its competitors?

Previous Grade History

NOTE: Our evaluation criteria changed in 2024. The scores from previous review years through 2021 are based on a different set of criteria measured.

Click or tap on a grade year to review additional details (where available).